Alito Deserves the Ginsburg Treatment

Alito Deserves the Ginsburg Treatment

Commentary by Sanford D. Horn

October 31, 2005

President Bush should be applauded for not bowing to pressure groups either from the left or the right in opting instead to listen to his conscience by selecting Judge Samuel A. Alito, Jr. to replace retiring Associate Justice Sandra Day O’Connor as the next justice on the Supreme Court of the United States.

The New Jersey native and resident is eminently qualified to serve on the nation’s highest court. An undergraduate at Princeton and law student at Yale who also served as its law journal editor, Alito argued 12 cases before the Supreme Court between 1981 and 1985 on behalf of the US government as Assistant to the Solicitor General.

Among other appointments during his career, Alito earned unanimous confirmation twice by the U. S. Senate, first to serve as U. S. Attorney for the District of New Jersey, then for the U. S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit. Yet, in spite of these unanimous appointments, liberal Democratic Senators such as Chuck Schumer (NY) and Minority Leader Harry Reid (NV) quickly weighed in with rhetoric indicative that they have already determined to vote against Alito.

It is painfully obvious that most Democrats have a litmus test regarding high court appointments based upon abortion and Roe v. Wade. Alito is to be praised for his lone dissenting vote in 1991 as a judge on the Third U. S. Circuit Court of Appeals attempting to uphold a Pennsylvania law mandating that a wife consult with her husband prior to an abortion (Planned Parenthood v. Casey). Yet, Alito proved to be no ideologue by voting in 2000 that a New Jersey law banning late-term abortions was unconstitutional.

In attempting to return sanity to the holiday season, Alito voted, as part of the majority in the 1999 case ACLU v. Schundler. The court determined that a display in Jersey City, NJ did not violate the First Amendment’s establishment clause because it contained not only a menorah representing Chanukah and a crèche representing Christmas, but a Frosty the Snowman and a banner praising diversity.

On the virtue of these two cases, Samuel A. Alito, Jr. should be confirmed by the U. S. Senate and take his place on the Supreme Court. How close the vote will be, remains to be seen based upon the intellectual honesty and integrity of the Democrats in the Upper House. The question that needs to be addressed is whether or not Judge Alito is qualified to serve on the Supreme Court of the United States. The answer, as was the case with Ruth Bader Ginsburg, formerly with the ACLU, is yes.

Justice Ginsburg secured her seat on the Supreme Court in 1993 with a 97-3 vote in the affirmative. Obviously ideological conservatives voted in favor of a committed liberal. Some of those conservative votes came from Robert Bennett (UT), Christopher “Kit” Bond (MO), Conrad Burns (MT), Larry Craig (ID), Orrin Hatch (UT), Trent Lott (MS) and Richard Lugar (IN), all of whom continue their tenure in the US Senate. These conservative senators along with former members Phil Gramm (TX), Alan Simpson (WY) and the late Strom Thurmond (SC) among others, put partisanship behind them and determined that Justice Ginsburg possessed the necessary qualifications to sit on the Supreme Court.

Will Judge Alito be given the same honest consideration from the Democrats? Early indication from the likes of Senators Schumer and Reid is that Alito will go through a knock down-drag out confirmation process. Does any political junkie with an ounce of intelligence expect Alito to receive favorable votes from Senators Joseph Biden (DE), Barbara Boxer (CA), Hillary Clinton (NY), Dianne Feinstein (CA), Ted Kennedy (MA), John Kerry (MA), Barbara Mikulski (MD), or Barack Obama (IL)? The answer to that obviously rhetorical question is resoundingly “no.”

Yet, despite the hardcore ideological left, Judge Alito can expect to become Justice Alito by a 65-35 margin with a margin of error of three.

Sanford D. Horn is a writer and political consultant living in Alexandria, VA.

[This column appeared in the Alexandria Times.]

A Tired Parks Stood for Sitting

A Tired Parks Stood for Sitting

Commentary by Sanford D. Horn

October 26, 2005

Some actions tend to have unintended consequences. Rosa Parks did not set out to start an evolution, yet her simple act of sitting became the catalyst of a race rising up.

Yes, evolution, not revolution as a span of 90 years passed from 1865 to 1955 when Ms. Parks, an Alabama seamstress, educated at Alabama State College, decided she was simply too tired to stand. After all, she occupied a seat in the “colored” section of the bus – the fifth row of the bus, and first of the “colored” section.

Apparently the law stated that blacks and whites could not occupy the same seat on a bus and when a white person boarded the bus, he was “entitled” to a seat – even in the “colored” section, prior to seating a black rider.

Ultimately Rosa Parks’ December 1, 1955 arrest led to the Montgomery bus boycott that would last until December 21, 1956. This boycott cost Montgomery businesses revenue and even lives. However, it sparked a movement – initially one of non-violence led by Martin Luther King, Jr.

Boycotts with economic ramifications are powerful tools. Some might say more powerful than violence. When rioters took to the streets in Newark, Oakland and Watts during the 1960s, they destroyed their own neighborhoods. Critics watched with disbelief not understanding why people would destroy what little they had in their own neighborhoods.

On the other hand, economic boycotts are far more reaching, as demonstrated in Montgomery as white-owned businesses suffered egregiously. Cash, after all, is green, and neither black nor white.

Schools – public, private, religious and charter, would do well to teach this lesson and about the unintended heroic Rosa Parks. Sadly, too few students, black, white or otherwise know about Rosa Parks. She undoubtedly will soon adorn a US postage stamp – and rightfully so.

Sanford D. Horn is a writer and political consultant living in Alexandria, VA.

[This column appeared in the Alexandria Times.]