And the Winner Isn’t…
Commentary by Sanford D. Horn
March 1, 2017
La La Land
a.k.a. Hollywood, a.k.a. the land of gentrified hypocrisy.
In the category of “Most deliciously ironic moment of the
entire Oscars,” the winner is – oh, wait, it’s a tie: the moment when the so-called
Hollywood elites realized nobody cared until the botching of the Best Picture
award, and the moment when the film representing the entire movie industry, La La Land, like the industry itself,
was the big loser on Sunday night.
I probably had not watched an Oscars program in at least
10 years, but my wife Vicky wanted me to watch with her, and instead of
complaining about it, and there were no decent college basketball games on that
night, I remembered an oft-quoted line from one my favorite movies: “keep your
friends close, but your enemies closer.” (OK, I compromised and watched the big
award categories.)
Nothing spectacular occurred for the first 12 hours of
the program – the usual trite and hackneyed anti-Trump comments here, liberal
barbs there, hypocritical speeches everywhere, until the tail end of show when,
and apparently Price Waterhouse is falling on this sword, the Best Picture
fiasco allowed all previous statements to become as forgettable and innocuous as
the average American would know them to be.
However, lost in the mix of the Best Picture’s stupidly
mind-boggling flub for the ages, was a speech of epic hypocritical proportions
that must see the light of day. Amidst the traditional cantankerous comments spewing
forth from the mouths of the vapid and the vengeful, came the winner for Best
Foreign Language Film. The Salesman,
brainchild of screenplay writer and director Asghar Farhadi, was the second film
for which Farhadi took home this award. His film A Separation won in 2012.
Farhadi, 44, and a native of Khomeyni Shahr, Iran,
declined to attend the awards ceremony due to, according to his message, the
disrespect the United States is showing his country and the other six countries
under the travel ban by the Trump administration. Another example of selective
outrage, as did anyone hear Farhadi’s objections about the same seven countries
under the same ban during the Obama administration? Nope – just crickets.
Farhadi’s prepared message was read by Anousheh Ansari,
an Iranian-American and the first Iranian in space.
"I'm sorry
I'm not with you tonight. My absence is out of respect for the people of my
country and those of the other six nations who have been disrespected by the
inhumane law that bans entry of immigrants to the U.S. Dividing the world into
the us and our enemies categories creates fear, a deceitful justification for
aggression and war. These wars prevent democracy and human rights in countries
which themselves have been victims of aggression.”
Dripping
with hypocrisy, where to begin with Farhadi’s message? He calls American law
barring immigrants’ entry into the US “inhumane.” Is it inhumane of a country,
any country, to put itself first and protect its own citizens before opening the
doors to legal immigrants? Is it inhumane to ensure that those people migrating
to a new country have the best interest of their new country at heart?
As for real
inhumanity, Mr. Farhadi, see your own country, the Islamic Republic of Iran. Iran,
the country whose repeated mantra is “Death to America and death to Israel.”
Iran, the country, who, according to Human Rights Watch, punishes its own
citizens with death for same-sex relations, adultery, and blasphemy against Mohammad
– none of which are criminal offenses in the inhumane United States. This is
the same Iran that requires athletes and even chess players to forfeit rather
than vie against an Israeli.
The United
States is not dividing the world; the Islamic Republic of Iran is certainly
trying to do so. It is the worst state sponsor of terror worldwide. If
anything, Iran is bringing countries together to fight the Mullahs. Iran, in
violating the anti-nuclear deal with the United States, is creating strange
bedfellows of countries in the Middle East – countries not typically allied
with Israel, for example, see the benefit of siding with the globe’s lone
Jewish state in opposing a nuclear Iran.
In fact, in
2011, Farhadi himself was punished by his Iranian government for speaking
critically of that very government. After casting aspersions, Farhadi apologized.
Following
Ansari’s reading of Farhadi’s message, the lemmings in the audience, those
obsequious, fawning, sycophants mindlessly applauded the Iranian director for
criticizing the United States. These Hollywood denizens would never survive in
Iran – consider the aforementioned crimes for which violators would be
executed. The Ayatollah would behead Hollywood one by one. Were this country remotely
like the Islamic Republic of Iran those critical of President Trump could find
themselves on the sharp end of the executioner’s sword.
But this is
the United States of America, thank G-d. We can agree to disagree. We can
exercise our First Amendment right of free speech. People are free to speak ill
of President Trump, but they should not be surprised when such castigation is
returned. The world of Hollywood is in the minority. It is the silent majority,
the so-called fly-over states, which spoke vociferously in November at the
ballot boxes, and now is the time for them to be heard.
To the singers
and actors on stage, your gal lost, so suck it up, buttercups. You are
certainly welcome to continue bloviating, but know that those of us who shell
out our hard-earned money are tuning you out, turning you off, and dropping you
from our list of movies and concerts to see and hear. Hollywood has become tone
deaf and we the people are making them pay. In the grand scheme of what is
meaningful, Hollywood is full of the self-important, self-indulgent, self-congratulatory,
and self-aggrandizing. What they should be is self-effacing while hiding in
their gated neighborhoods, demanding guns be taken from honest Americans while
they have armed security at the ready. They epitomize hypocrisy at its very
worst.
Sanford D. Horn is a writer and educator
living in Westfield, IN.
No comments:
Post a Comment