Thursday, July 20, 2006

Hunker Down With History Book

Hunker Down With History Book
Commentary by Sanford D. Horn
July 20, 2006

Richard Cohen’s column “Hunker Down With History” should best have been entitled “Hunker Down With History Book,” as the left-leaning editorial writer demonstrated a serious lack of historical context and knowledge.

Suggesting Palestine was “first a colony of Turkey and later of Britain,” dismisses thousands of years of history. Jordan is Palestine. Palestine is Jordan. The land that is Israel, as bestowed by G-d upon Abraham and his descendants, has been the home of the Jewish people for several millennia – surviving attacks and invasions from the Roman Empire, the Greek Empire and others who are also extinct.

That the land of the Jewish people should be called Israel since its independence in 1948 does not diminish its place in history. To suggest that “Israel hunker down,” as Cohen so callously suggests, again demonstrates his lack of knowledge of the enemies of the Jewish state. And to call for such a hunkering contradicts his earlier statement that Hezbollah, “zealots are not amenable to reason.”

To hunker down is akin to suggesting that Israel wait it out or hide until the attacks are over. The attacks will never be over until Hezbollah and Israel’s other enemies achieve their ultimate goal – the destruction of Israel and the elimination of the Jewish people. These are the principles of Hezbollah, not as Cohen avers, “hatred of Israel.”

If anyone is unsure of the goals of Israel’s enemies, review the comments of Iran’s leader Mahmoud Ahmadinejad who not only is a Holocaust denier but has called for wiping Israel off the map. This is the same Iran currently funding Hezbollah.

Israel is in the right place geographically and on the right side of history – defending its right to simply exist. Richard Cohen is just wrong and should hunker down with a history book. Remember if Israel’s enemies lay down their arms, there can be peace. If Israel lays down its arms, there will be no more Israel.

Sanford D. Horn is a writer and educator living in Alexandria, VA.

Friday, January 27, 2006

Hitler Also Won an Election - How Did that Work Out?

Hitler Also Won an Election – How Did That Work Out?
Commentary by Sanford D. Horn
January 27, 2006

The terrorist Hamas won an allegedly fair and legal election last Wednesday, January 25 in the West Bank and Gaza Strip – land that should never have been ceded to Palestinians in the first place. Make no mistake, the Palestinians have a homeland – it’s called Jordan. Like Iran, Hamas would rejoice over the destruction of the Jewish state. Even after the surrender of the Gaza Strip, terrorism continued.

The Bush administration is reconsidering Palestinian aid as it considers Hamas a terrorist organization. (Former President Jimmy Carter said that such aid should continue.) Even the morally bankrupt Europe calls Hamas a terrorist group. Israel correctly said that to negotiate with a Hamas government would be disingenuous as the virulent anti-Israel Hamas is hell-bent on the “wiping Israel off the map,” as Iran’s leader has repeatedly expressed.

An election does not legitimize a terror state – lest we learn a lesson from Germany. Hitler won election in 1933, gained recognition by governments the world over and he began his reign of terror by rounding up and deporting Jewish citizens. Even after calling for the Nuremberg Laws that expelled Jewish students from schools and Jewish professionals from their careers, Germany still received a free pass from the likes of the spineless British Prime Minister Neville Chamberlain by granting the Nazi dictator appeasement in 1938 just one year prior to the advent of World War II.

Israel has a good friend in George W. Bush and an ally in the United States. "I don't see how you can be a partner in peace if you advocate the destruction of a country as part of your platform… and... if your party has got an armed wing. I made it very clear that the United States does not support political parties that want to destroy our ally, Israel," said President Bush last Thursday following the Hamas victory.

Sanford D. Horn is a writer and political consultant living in Alexandria, VA.

Friday, November 11, 2005

San Fran Secedes From the Union

San Fran Secedes From the Union
Commentary by Sanford D. Horn
November 11, 2005

To clarify, in case nobody noticed, on Election Day this past Tuesday, November 8, the City and County of San Francisco effectively voted to secede from the union.

Overstated? Hardly, as the voters decided to abandon the Second Amendment to the United States Constitution in their ban on guns. In one of the most liberal bastions in the western world, nearly 58 percent of the voters have decided that honest, law-abiding gun owners should now be labeled criminals. Handguns, hunting rifles, collectables, even guns on display in museums that are of usable quality have been deemed illegal by the People’s Republic of San Francisco. So have gun shops and shooting ranges.

Just to set the record straight, I am not a member of the National Rifle Association (NRA). I am not a gun owner, have never hunted nor do I live in San Francisco. But, I support the rights of those who do. The entire litany of my experience with firearms dates back to learning from a Marine friend the proper way to hold, carry, load and discharge a firearm. After weeks of lessons we took my newfound knowledge to the desert straddling west Texas and New Mexico to shoot at cans and bottles before cleaning up the refuse.

Globally, we are fighting a war on terror, yet in San Francisco, the people have surrendered to the criminal element by not allowing the law-abiding gun owners the Constitutionally-granted right to defend themselves, their families or their property that they worked hard to earn.

Passage of Proposition H, or should that be Preparation H because it is a real pain in the tuchus, will only hurt law-abiding gun owners. Criminals with guns are not about to surrender their illegally gained weapons. Instead, they will wield their weapons with greater bravado and confidence knowing that only police and those who require a gun for their jobs will have them. Home invasions, sadly, will rise. Robberies and street stick-ups will also increase as thugs and criminals instill greater fear in those lemmings who believe the surrender of guns and Constitutional rights are the answer.

Until Proposition H is reversed, gun owners, gun shop owners, firing range owners, NRA members and all those who support the Second Amendment should have their voices heard via an economic boycott of San Francisco. As beautiful as parts of San Francisco are, the city and county should be shunned. Vacation elsewhere. Hold conventions elsewhere. Send a message that you will not allow your rights to be trampled upon by one of the most extreme, radical elements of American society.

Sanford D. Horn is a writer and political consultant living in Alexandria, VA.

Tuesday, November 1, 2005

Chabad Sukkah Closer to the Action

Chabad Sukkah Closer to the Action
Commentary by Sanford D. Horn
November 1, 2005

With all of the positive publicity regarding the University of Maryland Hillel and its sukkah in parking Lot 1, the rest of the story remained untold.

Directly outside of Byrd Stadium, the home of Terrapin football, on the press box side of the stadium, stood the Chabad Sukkah Mobile run by students and members of the Chabad Jewish Student Center. Those entering the Sukkah Mobile pronounced a couple of holiday-appropriate brachot and enjoyed honey/pound cake and took home a colorful and informative calendar.

No solicitations for donations, no sermons, just the Reader’s Digest version of Sukkot in a tiny oasis amid the chaos of 54,000 Terrapin and Hokie fans jamming their way into Byrd Stadium – myself and two friends included. As a season ticket holder, member of the Alumni Association and Terrapin Club, I am not, however, a contributor to Hillel, for personal reasons.

I do plan to contribute to the Chabad at the University of Maryland and would encourage others to do so as well. This organization provides many needed services to students, but do not garner the publicity and ultimately the dollars of that of Hillel. Some of Chabad’s activities include, but are not limited to free Shabbat dinners, fairs, social events and holiday observances.

Bais Menachem Chabad Jewish Student Center is located at
7403 Hopkins Avenue, College Park, MD 20740
. The phone number is 301-277-2994 and the website is
www.umdchabad.org.

Sanford D. Horn is a writer and political consultant living in Alexandria, VA.

[This column appeared in the Washington Jewish Week.]

Monday, October 31, 2005

Alito Deserves the Ginsburg Treatment

Alito Deserves the Ginsburg Treatment
Commentary by Sanford D. Horn
October 31, 2005

President Bush should be applauded for not bowing to pressure groups either from the left or the right in opting instead to listen to his conscience by selecting Judge Samuel A. Alito, Jr. to replace retiring Associate Justice Sandra Day O’Connor as the next justice on the Supreme Court of the United States.

The New Jersey native and resident is eminently qualified to serve on the nation’s highest court. An undergraduate at Princeton and law student at Yale who also served as its law journal editor, Alito argued 12 cases before the Supreme Court between 1981 and 1985 on behalf of the US government as Assistant to the Solicitor General.

Among other appointments during his career, Alito earned unanimous confirmation twice by the U. S. Senate, first to serve as U. S. Attorney for the District of New Jersey, then for the U. S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit. Yet, in spite of these unanimous appointments, liberal Democratic Senators such as Chuck Schumer (NY) and Minority Leader Harry Reid (NV) quickly weighed in with rhetoric indicative that they have already determined to vote against Alito.

It is painfully obvious that most Democrats have a litmus test regarding high court appointments based upon abortion and Roe v. Wade. Alito is to be praised for his lone dissenting vote in 1991 as a judge on the Third U. S. Circuit Court of Appeals attempting to uphold a Pennsylvania law mandating that a wife consult with her husband prior to an abortion (Planned Parenthood v. Casey). Yet, Alito proved to be no ideologue by voting in 2000 that a New Jersey law banning late-term abortions was unconstitutional.

In attempting to return sanity to the holiday season, Alito voted, as part of the majority in the 1999 case ACLU v. Schundler. The court determined that a display in Jersey City, NJ did not violate the First Amendment’s establishment clause because it contained not only a menorah representing Chanukah and a crèche representing Christmas, but a Frosty the Snowman and a banner praising diversity.

On the virtue of these two cases, Samuel A. Alito, Jr. should be confirmed by the U. S. Senate and take his place on the Supreme Court. How close the vote will be, remains to be seen based upon the intellectual honesty and integrity of the Democrats in the Upper House. The question that needs to be addressed is whether or not Judge Alito is qualified to serve on the Supreme Court of the United States. The answer, as was the case with Ruth Bader Ginsburg, formerly with the ACLU, is yes.

Justice Ginsburg secured her seat on the Supreme Court in 1993 with a 97-3 vote in the affirmative. Obviously ideological conservatives voted in favor of a committed liberal. Some of those conservative votes came from Robert Bennett (UT), Christopher “Kit” Bond (MO), Conrad Burns (MT), Larry Craig (ID), Orrin Hatch (UT), Trent Lott (MS) and Richard Lugar (IN), all of whom continue their tenure in the US Senate. These conservative senators along with former members Phil Gramm (TX), Alan Simpson (WY) and the late Strom Thurmond (SC) among others, put partisanship behind them and determined that Justice Ginsburg possessed the necessary qualifications to sit on the Supreme Court.

Will Judge Alito be given the same honest consideration from the Democrats? Early indication from the likes of Senators Schumer and Reid is that Alito will go through a knock down-drag out confirmation process. Does any political junkie with an ounce of intelligence expect Alito to receive favorable votes from Senators Joseph Biden (DE), Barbara Boxer (CA), Hillary Clinton (NY), Dianne Feinstein (CA), Ted Kennedy (MA), John Kerry (MA), Barbara Mikulski (MD), or Barack Obama (IL)? The answer to that obviously rhetorical question is resoundingly “no.”

Yet, despite the hardcore ideological left, Judge Alito can expect to become Justice Alito by a 65-35 margin with a margin of error of three.

Sanford D. Horn is a writer and political consultant living in Alexandria, VA.

[This column appeared in the Alexandria Times.]

Wednesday, October 26, 2005

A Tired Parks Stood for Sitting

A Tired Parks Stood for Sitting
Commentary by Sanford D. Horn
October 26, 2005

Some actions tend to have unintended consequences. Rosa Parks did not set out to start an evolution, yet her simple act of sitting became the catalyst of a race rising up.

Yes, evolution, not revolution as a span of 90 years passed from 1865 to 1955 when Ms. Parks, an Alabama seamstress, educated at Alabama State College, decided she was simply too tired to stand. After all, she occupied a seat in the “colored” section of the bus – the fifth row of the bus, and first of the “colored” section.

Apparently the law stated that blacks and whites could not occupy the same seat on a bus and when a white person boarded the bus, he was “entitled” to a seat – even in the “colored” section, prior to seating a black rider.

Ultimately Rosa Parks’ December 1, 1955 arrest led to the Montgomery bus boycott that would last until December 21, 1956. This boycott cost Montgomery businesses revenue and even lives. However, it sparked a movement – initially one of non-violence led by Martin Luther King, Jr.

Boycotts with economic ramifications are powerful tools. Some might say more powerful than violence. When rioters took to the streets in Newark, Oakland and Watts during the 1960s, they destroyed their own neighborhoods. Critics watched with disbelief not understanding why people would destroy what little they had in their own neighborhoods.

On the other hand, economic boycotts are far more reaching, as demonstrated in Montgomery as white-owned businesses suffered egregiously. Cash, after all, is green, and neither black nor white.

Schools – public, private, religious and charter, would do well to teach this lesson and about the unintended heroic Rosa Parks. Sadly, too few students, black, white or otherwise know about Rosa Parks. She undoubtedly will soon adorn a US postage stamp – and rightfully so.

Sanford D. Horn is a writer and political consultant living in Alexandria, VA.

[This column appeared in the Alexandria Times.]

Monday, September 19, 2005

Blueprint for New Orleans' Future - A Public-Private Project

Blueprint for New Orleans’ Future – A Public-Private Project
Commentary by Sanford D. Horn
September 19, 2005

The sounds of Louis Armstrong and Pete Fountain may remain faint whispers in the recesses of our memories for quite some time to come – translation: several years before it is truly safe to reinhabit the Crescent City. The same is true of the Green Wave welcoming fans back to the Tulane campus or the Saints kicking off in the Superdome any time soon.

For Mayor Ray Nagin to begin a “reentry” process based upon zip codes representing land areas not as severely affected by Hurricane Katrina is tremendously shortsighted. He had to retract that invitation to his city’s residents in light of the pending onslaught of Hurricane Rita. Rita or no Rita, Nagin had no business suggesting that people return to New Orleans just based upon EPA and FEMA reports.

The rebuilding process will not be completed overnight – nor should it be – if it is to be done properly. The old adage “haste makes waste,” is quite apt in this circumstance. A deliberate step-by-step plan must be implemented in order to not only salvage this once vibrant city, but improve both the city and its surrounding suburbs for a better future and a longer lasting levee system. Parenthetically, when it comes to blame, which will be levied, no pun intended, later, let’s start with the fact that the levees, for the past half century, have been substandard – only prepared to handle a Category Three hurricane and not the monstrous storm that ravaged the Gulf Coast.

Before a rebuilding effort can commence a solid foundation must be created – a challenge in itself noting the city was built below sea level. This foundation must not be built atop sludge, feces and other life-threatening contaminants. All debris and disease-inducing agents must be eradicated beyond the standards of FEMA, the EPA and the CDC. Experts should be on the scene to determine how many layers need to be exfoliated from the land to make it appropriate for building.

However, even before one brick is laid, even before one wheelbarrow of cement is mixed, engineers and city planners must be imported to evaluate where rebuilding makes the most sense. Some portions of the Greater New Orleans area may require razing before rebuilding can occur. That is for the experts to decide – preferably non-governmental experts. This may mean building in a smaller portion of the previous incarnation of New Orleans. Better safe than stupid. Infrastructure such as roads, bridges and levees need to be rebuilt, reinforced and strengthened to specifications that will withstand a Category Five hurricane. Call it an investment.


Where there’s any decent investment, there is a return. In this case, this would be a more than decent investment that will no doubt yield more than just a decent return. And this investment includes schools. Schools should be the center of new communities along with hospitals and houses of worship. These buildings should be rebuilt or reinforced so that they may serve as beacons to communities that will only grow stronger.

Donald Trump, Habitat for Humanity and other home building organizations along with businesses such as The Home Depot, Pulte Homes, Lowes and DR Horton, to name a few, should work together to begin rebuilding New Orleans. Of course this will have to wait until after Hurricane Rita is done dancing through the Crescent City. Tax incentives should be offered to corporations who step up to the plate and pitch in, to mix a metaphor.

Federal involvement should not be in the form of hand outs. It took guts for 11 Republican Congressmen to vote against the latest financial aid package. These are not scrooge-like people who do not understand the plight of the Gulf Coast residents. No, instead they are fiscally responsible elected officials who do not believe in issuing a pseudo blank check. While the legislation that passed overwhelmingly in the House did have a dollar amount on the bottom line, none of the other lines on the bill specified how that money would be spent. What is the breakdown of the funding? With the history of corruption that has plagued Louisiana for more than a century, turning over these finances unwatched and unsupervised is much akin to offering free chocolate chip cookies at a Weight Watchers meeting. President Bush needs to do more than send a handful of paper-pushing bureaucrats to oversee this operation.

The federal government, in addition to offering tax incentives to corporate rebuilders, should be offering low interest mortgages to citizens who will return to New Orleans and its surrounding suburbs. Enterprise zones should be forged, a la Jack Kemp, former HUD Secretary under President Reagan. This lends itself well to the concept of home ownership and personal responsibility, a la the late Arizona Senator Barry Goldwater.

With homes being built around schools and houses of worship, a business atmosphere will be forged. Supermarkets and other businesses will be built in these newly created enterprise zones.

Thanks to LBJ, the War on Poverty has been lost. His continual priming of the pump aided and abetted the enemy in this war that, thanks to Katrina, became as evident as the high rising flood waters. Handouts clearly failed. It’s time to try a hand up via the enterprise zone concept.




Houston, We Have A Hero

Praise and thanks must be showered upon Houston, TX and every other city, town and hamlet that has offered housing and schools to the thousands of displaced citizens. Not enough can be said for those who opened their hearts, homes, wallets, churches, synagogues and schools to help out in this time of need.

However, extreme circumstances do tend to not only bring out the best in people, but also the very worst. There are opportunists out there wearing clean suits and ties as well as dirty t-shirts who must be exorcized in the worst way, for they have behaved in the worst way.

Hurricanes and flooding are not invitations for looting, rape and murder. When government officials advised people to flee New Orleans, many of those who stubbornly stayed behind did so to commit heinous acts. With no electricity, what was the purpose of stealing a television? Many innocent people who were unable to escape the storm faced another storm while seeking refuge in the convention center and the Superdome. That storm took the form of crime. These were people of the least common denominator who took it upon themselves to commit illegal acts.

People do not commit crime because they are poor. There are far too many people who are poor in this the richest nation in the world. But they are not using their poverty as an excuse to loot, rob, rape and murder. Ignorance and lack of education are the primary reasons people commit crimes. Katrina has shed a light on the impoverishment of our educational system in the United States – not just in the big cities, but nationwide.

This is not about an endorsement of or indictment against No Child Left Behind. That is for another day and another column. No, this is about the necessity for a strengthened educational system with greater support offered by school administrations, stronger discipline, an end to social promotion and personal responsibility by students and parents alike.

As for those wearing clean suits claiming to represent fictitious charities, they are no better than those who loot, rob, rape and murder. In some cases they are worse as they erode the faith of good people who are trying to make a difference, but instead have fallen prey to such charlatans. They should be prosecuted to the fullest extent of the law alongside those in the dirty t-shirts who have committed their acts of violence and mayhem.

The Blame Game

As the blame game continues, where are America’s so-called black leaders? Did either Jesse Jackson or Al Sharpton take to the airwaves to call for calm in New Orleans or to reassure the stranded in the Crescent City that help was forthcoming? Did either Jackson or Sharpton preach non-violence while snipers attempted to kill helicopter pilots and medical workers from bringing aid and assistance to the suffering throngs in New Orleans? Did either Jackson or Sharpton appear on talk radio or the television news channels to demand that people not loot, rob, rape or murder? Rhetorically, no, to all of the above questions.

Instead, Jackson, Sharpton and others took to the bully pulpit to blame President Bush for not reacting fast enough and in some cases accused him of racism and leaving black citizens to suffer almost certain deaths. Tell both of the President’s Secretaries of State – General Colin Powell in the first term and the current SOS Condoleezza Rice as well as the current HUD Secretary Alphonso Jackson that this commander in chief is racist. Remind people that black homeownership is up during the Bush administration as compared to his predecessor, Bill Clinton who was revered in the black community.

Those facts are not newsworthy because they do not fit the mold of the blame game. Blame should start with those administrators who more than a half century ago decided that levees with the strength to combat a Category Three hurricane would suffice. Then fast forward to 2005.

Hurricane Katrina devastated New Orleans, LA, Biloxi, MS and other surrounding areas. This was not an attack or assault by an armed enemy, but instead a natural disaster. And those who suggested that the money spent on the current conflict in Iraq is the reason New Orleans relief did not occur fast enough are simply misinformed.

Mayor Nagin and Louisiana Governor Kathleen Blanco had the responsibility to ask for federal assistance. It is not the job of the federal government to impose itself upon the states. Their lack of leadership could be felt immediately, they were not held as accountable for their local problem as the president who is obligated to all Americans in 50 states.

Once the federal government began to play a role in this natural disaster, the National Guard should have been dispatched 10-fold by comparison to those actually deployed. Food and water, meanwhile, could only be provided as fast as people could get it where it was needed while fighting disease-filled, feces-filled rising flood waters.

New Orleans should be rebuilt, albeit a smaller, safer version. Those who have sought shelter elsewhere who have nothing to return to should consider rebuilding their lives in those new safer havens. Those who do return should do so with the attitude that their hard work will be the bellwether for a stronger, safer future in a stronger, safer city, not with a handout, but with a hand up.

Sanford D. Horn is a writer and political consultant living in Alexandria, VA.